Click to download and read pdf
I remember attending a press event at Interwaste in Germiston back in 2016 for the launch of South Africa’s first refuse derived fuel (RDF) plant. RDF, according to Mike Nicholls speaking at that time, is dry industrial waste, which Interwaste sources locally by sorting suitable waste from targeted industries: furniture manufacturers and generators of non-recyclable/single use plastic waste, for example. Interwaste had begun to manufacture two types of fuel from the waste collected from its partner customers: a pelletised solid fuel from wood-based waste, extruded logs and cardboard; and a fuel called ‘fluff’ produced by shredding and baling the pre-sorted plastic waste.
Our lead Environmental management article in this issue features another article from Interwaste, in which Kate Stubbs urges us to re-imagine waste for energy production. She talks of the circular economy, in which resource input, waste, emissions and energy leakage are minimised. “This means eliminating unnecessary wastage and waste generation that would eventually be disposed of at a landfill site,” she says, “…by optimising resource efficiency through sustainable product designs; recovery, re-use and recycling of products; or energy production through the systematic approach of the waste hierarchy.”
Retired British long-distance solo-sailor, Dame Ellen MacArthur, has established a foundation ‘to accelerate the transition towards a circular economy’. Having to spend months on a yacht carrying everything needed for survival gives a keen sense of maximising resource use – food, material and energy – and minimising waste.
She argues that the current system is no longer working for businesses, people or the environment. “We take resources from the ground to make products, which we use, and, when we no longer want them, throw them away. Take-make-waste. We call this a linear economy,” she says.
“We must transform all the elements of the take-make-waste system: how we manage resources, how we make and use products, and what we do with the materials afterwards. Only then can we create a thriving economy that can benefit everyone within the limits of our planet,” MacArthur argues.
She believes that waste and pollution are consequences of the way our products and systems are designed. By changing our mindset to view waste as a design flaw, we can harness new materials and technologies to ensure that waste and pollution are not created.
She sees the circular economy, as “a new way to design, make and use things within planetary boundaries. Shifting the system involves everyone and everything: businesses, governments, and individuals; our cities, our products, and our jobs. By designing out waste and pollution, keeping products and materials in use and regenerating natural systems we can reinvent everything.” Exciting!
The mindset shift is the key, though. I am a recycler of plastic and an avoider of single use non-recyclable plastic. But it is impossibly hard to buy even basic foods without accumulating volumes of single-use plastic waste. I have started to make ‘plastic bricks’ from waste plastic film, by stuffing it into two-litre plastic bottles for use in simple cement-displacing building projects. I am unconvinced this solves any environmental issues, but it does make one very aware of just how much waste we are generating. It also makes burning it seem a least-bad option, particularly when factoring-in the effect of the plastic islands in our oceans.
A ship full of plastic waste exported from the UK has recently been rejected for recycling by Malaysia. On its return it is likely to be incinerated because landfill is in very short supply. It must surely be a better idea to use its fuel-value to mitigate against some of the emissions?
Kate Stubbs says that single-site producers seldom produce sufficient waste to justify developing a standalone waste-to-energy micro-generation project. Pooling non-recyclable refuse for derived fuel micro-generation, however, makes perfect sense. A ship load for example?
Interwaste’s Germiston RDF plant, converts single-use plastic waste into ‘fluff’ for use as fuel, either alone or with a co-combustor such as coal. This repurposing of waste-to-fuel reduces both the volume of non-recyclable waste to landfill and the consumption of conventional fuels that are non-renewable and potentially environmentally harmful. Plastic ‘fluff’ is particularly well suited to the calcining process in cement kilns, because non-combustible particulate emissions from the plastic tend to be encapsulated in the end product, leaving almost no ash.
Using plastic waste in this way is soon likely to make financial sense. Stubbs points out that the global waste-to-energy market is expected to grow from US$28.4-billion in 2017 to almost $43-billion in 2024, “representing a massive economic opportunity to establish new industries and/or revenue streams.”
And Interwaste is “striving to ensure that waste-to-energy opportunities can be realised locally.”
